[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200805041111.GB10174@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 21:11:11 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Cc: timur@...nel.org, Xiubo.Lee@...il.com, festevam@...il.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Refine enable and disable sequence
for synchronous mode
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 10:23:53AM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> Tx synchronous with Rx:
> The TCSR.TE is no need to enabled when only Rx is going to be enabled.
> Check if need to disable RSCR.RE before disabling TCSR.TE.
>
> Rx synchronous with Tx:
> The RCSR.RE is no need to enabled when only Tx is going to be enabled.
> Check if need to disable TSCR.RE before disabling RCSR.TE.
Please add to the commit log more context such as what we have
discussed: what's the problem of the current driver, and why we
_have_to_ apply this change though it's sightly against what RM
recommends.
(If thing is straightforward, it's okay to make the text short.
Yet I believe that this change deserves more than these lines.)
One info that you should mention -- also the main reason why I'm
convinced to add this change: trigger() is still in the shape of
the early version where we only supported one operation mode --
Tx synchronous with Rx. So we need an update for other modes.
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
The git-diff part looks good, please add this in next ver.:
Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Btw, the new fsl_sai_dir_is_synced() can be probably applied to
other places with a followup patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists