[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtX0a3tui_KQfCXLcARVcev9V-HV6HMkXgVXObq8w-4EQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:53:39 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 12:21 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the ftrace tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> kernel/kprobes.c: In function 'kill_kprobe':
> kernel/kprobes.c:1116:33: warning: statement with no effect [-Wunused-value]
> 1116 | #define disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p) (-ENODEV)
> | ^
> kernel/kprobes.c:2154:3: note: in expansion of macro 'disarm_kprobe_ftrace'
> 2154 | disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
Sorry, maybe we should rework the macro of disarm_kprobe_ftrace to an
inline function like below.
-#define disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p) (-ENODEV)
+static inline int disarm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+ return -ENODEV
+}
#endif
> Introduced by commit
>
> 0cb2f1372baa ("kprobes: Fix NULL pointer dereference at kprobe_ftrace_handler")
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
--
Yours,
Muchun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists