[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200805104056.2b1591a8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:40:56 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the sh tree
Hi all,
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:38:12 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/um/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> 5c77ba8aa183 ("dma-mapping: consolidate the NO_DMA definition in kernel/dma/Kconfig")
>
> from the sh tree and commit:
>
> 140c8180eb7c ("arch: remove HAVE_COPY_THREAD_TLS")
>
> from the pidfd tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc arch/um/Kconfig
> index 32c1d1945033,ef69be17ff70..000000000000
> --- a/arch/um/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/um/Kconfig
> @@@ -14,8 -14,6 +14,7 @@@ config UM
> select HAVE_FUTEX_CMPXCHG if FUTEX
> select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
> select HAVE_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
> - select HAVE_COPY_THREAD_TLS
> + select NO_DMA
> select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
> select GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
> select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
This is now a conflict between the sh tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists