[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200805075717.GB635696@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:57:17 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dongdong Yang <contribute.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yangdongdong@...omi.com,
yanziily@...omi.com, rocking@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sched: Provide USF for the portable equipment.
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:36:21PM +0800, Dongdong Yang wrote:
> +#define usf_attr_rw(_name) \
> +static struct device_attribute _name = \
> +__ATTR_RW(_name)
I also asked you to use DEVICE_ATTR_RW() and not use "raw" kobjects.
Why you ignore code review is odd...
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists