linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] sched: Provide USF for the portable equipment.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:57:17 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Dongdong Yang <contribute.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yangdongdong@...omi.com,
        yanziily@...omi.com, rocking@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sched: Provide USF for the portable equipment.

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:36:21PM +0800, Dongdong Yang wrote:
> +#define usf_attr_rw(_name)						\
> +static struct device_attribute _name =					\
> +__ATTR_RW(_name)

I also asked you to use DEVICE_ATTR_RW() and not use "raw" kobjects.

Why you ignore code review is odd...

greg k-h