linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] fork cleanup for v5.9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:31:28 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] fork cleanup for v5.9

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 01:28:01PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> High-level this does two main things:
> 1. Remove the double export of both do_fork() and _do_fork() where do_fork()
>    used the incosistent legacy clone calling convention. Now we only export
>    _do_fork() which is based on struct kernel_clone_args.

Can we retire the _do_fork name as well please?  For one we really don't
use single underscore prefix in the kernel, and we also try to avoid our
normal __ prefixes if there is no non-prefixed vesion.  Also the name
feels wrong, as this implements all of clone and not just fork.
What about kernel_clone to match the name of the args structure?

Also none of them actaully is exported (thankfully!).