linux-kernel - Aw: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] arm: dts: mt7623: add display subsystem related device nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:49:56 +0200
From:   Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:     Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@...iatek.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>,
        Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Aw: Re:  Re:  Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] arm: dts: mt7623: add display
 subsystem related device nodes

> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 05. August 2020 um 10:36 Uhr
> Von: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@...radead.org>

> > mt7623.dtsi => mt7623n.dtsi => mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2.dts
> > mt7623.dtsi => mt7623a.dtsi => mt7623a-unielec-u7623.dts (not existing yet,
> > openwrt seems to use a board-specific dtsi)
>
> Yes, I think we should.

i want to see what MTK/DT owner says to this...
my current way will be still adding the nodes to existing mt7623.dtsi (like ryder lee did it in original patch)
but disabling them to not break mt7623a and splitting it afterwards.

> I'll create mt7623a.dtsi and upstream the U7623 support; I think that
> can happen without conflicting with anything you do.
>
> I note that the GPU node has been added to mt7623.dtsi in 5.8 too;
> that'll want to move to the new mt7623n.dtsi that you create, along
> with your other new additions.

i guess mali-node also needs to be moved to mt7623n.dtsi, so my current way seems right...
but it's decision of MTK/DT owner. if they make a note i squash the disabling-commit into this and post v5

regards Frank