linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] net: tls: add compat for get/setsockopt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200805122501.4856-1-r.czerwinski@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Wed,  5 Aug 2020 14:25:02 +0200
From:   Rouven Czerwinski <r.czerwinski@...gutronix.de>
To:     Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>,
        Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@...lanox.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Rouven Czerwinski <r.czerwinski@...gutronix.de>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] net: tls: add compat for get/setsockopt

If compat_{s,g}etsockopt for TLS are not implemented, the TLS layer will
never be called on a system where CONFIG_COMPAT is enabled and userspace
is 32bit. Implement both to support CONFIG_COMPAT.

Signed-off-by: Rouven Czerwinski <r.czerwinski@...gutronix.de>
---
 net/tls/tls_main.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c
index ec10041c6b7d..92c5893fe692 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
@@ -450,6 +450,18 @@ static int tls_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 	return do_tls_getsockopt(sk, optname, optval, optlen);
 }
 
+static int tls_compat_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
+				 char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
+{
+	struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
+
+	if (level != SOL_TLS)
+		return ctx->sk_proto->compat_getsockopt(sk, level, optname,
+							optval, optlen);
+
+	return do_tls_getsockopt(sk, optname, optval, optlen);
+}
+
 static int do_tls_setsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
 				  unsigned int optlen, int tx)
 {
@@ -611,6 +623,18 @@ static int tls_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 	return do_tls_setsockopt(sk, optname, optval, optlen);
 }
 
+static int tls_compat_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
+				 char __user *optval, unsigned int optlen)
+{
+	struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
+
+	if (level != SOL_TLS)
+		return ctx->sk_proto->compat_setsockopt(sk, level, optname,
+							optval, optlen);
+
+	return do_tls_setsockopt(sk, optname, optval, optlen);
+}
+
 struct tls_context *tls_ctx_create(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
@@ -660,6 +684,10 @@ static void build_protos(struct proto prot[TLS_NUM_CONFIG][TLS_NUM_CONFIG],
 	prot[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE].setsockopt	= tls_setsockopt;
 	prot[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE].getsockopt	= tls_getsockopt;
 	prot[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE].close		= tls_sk_proto_close;
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+	prot[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE].compat_setsockopt	= tls_compat_setsockopt;
+	prot[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE].compat_getsockopt	= tls_compat_getsockopt;
+#endif
 
 	prot[TLS_SW][TLS_BASE] = prot[TLS_BASE][TLS_BASE];
 	prot[TLS_SW][TLS_BASE].sendmsg		= tls_sw_sendmsg;
-- 
2.27.0