lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:20:09 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Rustam Kovhaev <rkovhaev@...il.com>
Cc:     dledford@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in netdevice_event_work_handler

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 01:00:13PM -0700, Rustam Kovhaev wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 07:22:26PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 02:11:22PM -0700, Rustam Kovhaev wrote:
> > 
> > > IB roce driver receives NETDEV_UNREGISTER event, calls dev_hold() and
> > > schedules work item to execute, and before wq gets a chance to complete
> > > it, we return to ip_tunnel.c:274 and call free_netdev(), and then later
> > > we get UAF when scheduled function references already freed net_device
> > > 
> > > i added verbose logging to ip_tunnel.c to see pcpu_refcnt:
> > > +       pr_info("about to free_netdev(dev) dev->pcpu_refcnt %d", netdev_refcnt_read(dev));
> > > 
> > > and got the following:
> > > [  410.220127][ T2944] ip_tunnel: about to free_netdev(dev) dev->pcpu_refcnt 8
> > 
> > I think there is a missing call to netdev_wait_allrefs() in the
> > rollback_registered_many().
> calling it there leads to rtnl deadlock, i think we should call
> net_set_todo(), so that later when we call rtnl_unlock() it will
> execute netdev_run_todo() and there it will proceed to calling
> netdev_wait_allrefs(), but in ip tunnel i will need get
> free_netdev() to be called after we unlock rtnl mutex
> i'll try to send a new patch for review

Oh the whole register is called under rtnl? Yikes..

This is probably a systemic problem with register_netdevice error
unwind, not just ip tunnel

The other way to handle it would be to organize things so that
register cannot fail once it starts calling notifiers?

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ