[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200805073929-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 07:40:15 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 19/24] vdpa: make sure set_features in invoked for
legacy
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 02:14:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/8/4 上午5:00, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Some legacy guests just assume features are 0 after reset.
> > We detect that config space is accessed before features are
> > set and set features to 0 automatically.
> > Note: some legacy guests might not even access config space, if this is
> > reported in the field we might need to catch a kick to handle these.
>
>
> I wonder whether it's easier to just support modern device?
>
> Thanks
Well hardware vendors are I think interested in supporting legacy
guests. Limiting vdpa to modern only would make it uncompetitive.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c | 1 +
> > include/linux/vdpa.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c
> > index de211ef3738c..7105265e4793 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c
> > @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ struct vdpa_device *__vdpa_alloc_device(struct device *parent,
> > vdev->dev.release = vdpa_release_dev;
> > vdev->index = err;
> > vdev->config = config;
> > + vdev->features_valid = false;
> > err = dev_set_name(&vdev->dev, "vdpa%u", vdev->index);
> > if (err)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/vdpa.h b/include/linux/vdpa.h
> > index 239db794357c..29b8296f1414 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/vdpa.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/vdpa.h
> > @@ -33,12 +33,14 @@ struct vdpa_notification_area {
> > * @dma_dev: the actual device that is performing DMA
> > * @config: the configuration ops for this device.
> > * @index: device index
> > + * @features_valid: were features initialized? for legacy guests
> > */
> > struct vdpa_device {
> > struct device dev;
> > struct device *dma_dev;
> > const struct vdpa_config_ops *config;
> > unsigned int index;
> > + bool features_valid;
> > };
> > /**
> > @@ -266,4 +268,36 @@ static inline struct device *vdpa_get_dma_dev(struct vdpa_device *vdev)
> > {
> > return vdev->dma_dev;
> > }
> > +
> > +static inline void vdpa_reset(struct vdpa_device *vdev)
> > +{
> > + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config;
> > +
> > + vdev->features_valid = false;
> > + ops->set_status(vdev, 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int vdpa_set_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u64 features)
> > +{
> > + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config;
> > +
> > + vdev->features_valid = true;
> > + return ops->set_features(vdev, features);
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > +static inline void vdpa_get_config(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned offset,
> > + void *buf, unsigned int len)
> > +{
> > + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Config accesses aren't supposed to trigger before features are set.
> > + * If it does happen we assume a legacy guest.
> > + */
> > + if (!vdev->features_valid)
> > + vdpa_set_features(vdev, 0);
> > + ops->get_config(vdev, offset, buf, len);
> > +}
> > +
> > #endif /* _LINUX_VDPA_H */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists