[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200805153120.GU2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:31:20 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt.kanzenbach@...utronix.de>,
Alison Wang <alison.wang@....com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, mw@...ihalf.com,
leoyang.li@....com, vladimir.oltean@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Disable fine-grained task level
IRQ time accounting
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 02:56:49PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> I've been tempted to say the test case is a bit bogus, but am not familiar
> enough with the RT throttling details to stand that ground. That said, from
> both looking at the execution and the stress-ng source code, it seems to
> unconditionally spawn 32 FIFO-50 tasks (there's even an option to make
> these FIFO-99!!!), which is quite a crowd on monoCPU systems.
Oh, so it's a case of: we do stupid without tuning and the system falls
over. I can live with that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists