linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/18] spi: stm32: move spi disable out of irq handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200805110125.GG5556@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:01:25 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...com>
Cc:     amelie.delaunay@...com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
        alexandre.torgue@...com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        fabrice.gasnier@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] spi: stm32: move spi disable out of irq handler

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 09:02:07AM +0200, Alain Volmat wrote:
> From: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@...com>
> 
> The spi disable could potentially require some time to finish.
> It has to be executed at the end of a transfer, but there is
> no reason to call it in the irq handler.
> 
> Simplify the irq handler by moving out the spi disable. The
> synchronization through xfer_completion is used to defer the
> execution of spi disable.

Should this be an unprepare_transfer_hardware() operation?  That would
allow the framework to take care of scheduling this in an appropriate
context with the added advantage of not needing to do it when there's
another message scheduled immediately.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)