[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdX-m+q-SYveM2BQyM+EoiQ1ctVviJzjs+UbTzH9cJaqMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:04:28 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: trix@...hat.com
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: of: reset name variable in of_gpiochip_add_hog
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your patch!
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 3:42 PM <trix@...hat.com> wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>
> Clang static analysis reports this error
>
> gpiolib-of.c:664:9: warning: 2nd function call argument
> is an uninitialized value [core.CallAndMessage]
> ret = gpiod_hog(desc, name, lflags, dflags);
>
> name is sometimes set by of_parse_own_gpio
> name is always used by gpiod_hog
This is a false-positive: gpiod_hog() is only called if
of_parse_own_gpio() returned success, in which case it has filled in the
name output parameter.
> So it is necessary to reset name so an old value is
> not mistakenly used by gpiod_hog.
Hence this is not needed.
> Fixes: bc21077e084b ("gpio: of: Extract of_gpiochip_add_hog()")
This is not the commit that introduced the "bug".
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> @@ -657,6 +657,7 @@ static int of_gpiochip_add_hog(struct gpio_chip *chip, struct device_node *hog)
> int ret;
>
> for (i = 0;; i++) {
> + name = NULL;
> desc = of_parse_own_gpio(hog, chip, i, &name, &lflags, &dflags);
> if (IS_ERR(desc))
> break;
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists