[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtU7iTFAZVRFgh5vgzB9nSOoDjm7F4Jqpd4uhEe8NListQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 23:51:34 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 11:11 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:53:39 +0800
> Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 12:21 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the ftrace tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
> > >
> > > kernel/kprobes.c: In function 'kill_kprobe':
> > > kernel/kprobes.c:1116:33: warning: statement with no effect [-Wunused-value]
> > > 1116 | #define disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p) (-ENODEV)
> > > | ^
> > > kernel/kprobes.c:2154:3: note: in expansion of macro 'disarm_kprobe_ftrace'
> > > 2154 | disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p);
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, maybe we should rework the macro of disarm_kprobe_ftrace to an
> > inline function like below.
> >
> > -#define disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p) (-ENODEV)
> > +static inline int disarm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
> > +{
> > + return -ENODEV
> > +}
> > #endif
>
> Looks like that would work. Care to send a formal patch. Could you also
> change arm_kprobe_ftrace() as well?
OK, I will do that. Thanks.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Steve
--
Yours,
Muchun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists