linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: remove the 2.6 "Upgrading I2C Drivers" guide

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200806181305.26777f7c@heffalump.sk2.org>
Date:   Thu, 6 Aug 2020 18:13:05 +0200
From:   Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: remove the 2.6 "Upgrading I2C Drivers" guide

Hi Jon,

You’ll see v2 of this patch show up soon, see the context below — this is a
patch on top of Mauro’s conversion of the i2c docs to .rst.

Regards,

Stephen


On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 10:33:56 +0200, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:

> > > Maybe because I don't have the commit in my tree? Can you rebase on top
> > > of 5.8?  
> > 
> > Ah, yes, the commit is on top of Linus’ current master, following the
> > merge of docs-5.9 from Jon’s tree. In 5.8 the file is a .txt file, but
> > Mauro converted it to .rst for 5.9, and this patch removes the latter
> > file (to avoid a merge conflict later on...). If you prefer, I can submit
> > it to the docs tree instead!  
> 
> I see. Thanks for the heads up!
> 
> > > And please also remove the reference in Documentation/i2c/index.rst  
> > 
> > Oops, yes, I’ll do that in v2 once we decide where it should go.  
> 
> I am fine with either it going via the doc-tree or you sending me v2
> again after 5.9-rc1. For the first case:
> 
> Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
> 

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped