[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61ad7b12b1d242247b066e6ffbf5f9382bc57b2a.camel@themaw.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 13:43:11 +0800
From: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/18] fsinfo: Add a uniquifier ID to struct mount [ver
#21]
On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 20:33 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 04:30:10PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > idr_alloc_cyclic() seems to be a good template for doing the
> > > lower
> > > 32bit allocation, and we can add code to increment the high 32bit
> > > on
> > > wraparound.
> > >
> > > Lots of code uses idr_alloc_cyclic() so I guess it shouldn't be
> > > too
> > > bad in terms of memory use or performance.
> >
> > It's optimised for shortness of path and trades memory for
> > performance. It's
> > currently implemented using an xarray, so memory usage is dependent
> > on the
> > sparseness of the tree. Each node in the tree is 576 bytes and in
> > the worst
> > case, each one node will contain one mount - and then you have to
> > backfill the
> > ancestry, though for lower memory costs.
> >
> > Systemd makes life more interesting since it sets up a whole load
> > of
> > propagations. Each mount you make may cause several others to be
> > created, but
> > that would likely make the tree more efficient.
>
> I would recommend using xa_alloc and ignoring the ID assigned from
> xa_alloc. Looking up by unique ID is then a matter of iterating
> every
> mount (xa_for_each()) looking for a matching unique ID in the mount
> struct. That's O(n) search, but it's faster than a linked list, and
> we
> don't have that many mounts in a system.
How many is not many, 5000, 10000, I agree that 30000 plus is fairly
rare, even for the autofs direct mount case I hope the implementation
here will help to fix.
Ian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists