[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <004701d66bb6$22a11410$67e33c30$@net>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 22:55:03 -0700
From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@...us.net>
To: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: "'Linux Documentation'" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"'Srinivas Pandruvada'" <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"'Giovanni Gherdovich'" <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
"'Francisco Jerez'" <francisco.jerez.plata@...el.com>,
"'Viresh Kumar'" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"'Linux PM'" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled
On 2020.08.05 09:56 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> v6 -> v7:
> * Cosmetic changes in store_energy_performance_prefernce() to reduce the
> LoC number and make it a bit easier to read. No intentional functional
> impact.
??
V7 is identical to V6.
Diff:
$ diff hwppassive-v6-2-2.patch hwppassive-v7-2-2.patch
2c2
< Sent: August 4, 2020 8:11 AM
---
> Sent: August 5, 2020 9:56 AM
5c5
< Subject: [PATCH v6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled
---
> Subject: [PATCH v7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled
76a77,81
>
> v6 -> v7:
> * Cosmetic changes in store_energy_performance_prefernce() to reduce the
> LoC number and make it a bit easier to read. No intentional functional
> impact.
... Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists