linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: tls: add compat for get/setsockopt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f27d55ee29ad1f78e5ad47e3c63b6021d6df6895.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 06 Aug 2020 08:41:50 +0200
From:   Rouven Czerwinski <r.czerwinski@...gutronix.de>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     borisp@...lanox.com, aviadye@...lanox.com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: tls: add compat for get/setsockopt

On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 17:45 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Neither of these patches apply cleanly to net-next.  The compat handling
> and TLS code has been changed quite a bit lately.

Indeed, Patch 1 is no longer required on net-next. I'll drop the patch.

> ALso, you must provide a proper header "[PATCH 0/N] ..." posting for your
> patch series which explains at a high level what your patch series is doing,
> how it is doing it, and why it is doing it that way.

Since I'm now down to one patch I'll forgo the cover letter and expand
the commit message.

Thanks for the explanation,
Rouven