linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: remove the 2.6 "Upgrading I2C Drivers" guide

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200806090800.08b77d4a@heffalump.sk2.org>
Date:   Thu, 6 Aug 2020 09:09:26 +0200
From:   Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: remove the 2.6 "Upgrading I2C Drivers" guide

Hi Wolfram,

On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 23:53:51 +0200, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 08:31:49PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > All the drivers have long since been upgraded, and all the important
> > information here is also included in the "Implementing I2C device
> > drivers" guide.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>  
> 
> True! Thanks.
> 
> But I can't apply the patch?
> 
> > base-commit: 2324d50d051ec0f14a548e78554fb02513d6dcef  
> 
> Maybe because I don't have the commit in my tree? Can you rebase on top
> of 5.8?

Ah, yes, the commit is on top of Linus’ current master, following the merge
of docs-5.9 from Jon’s tree. In 5.8 the file is a .txt file, but Mauro
converted it to .rst for 5.9, and this patch removes the latter file (to
avoid a merge conflict later on...). If you prefer, I can submit it to the
docs tree instead!

> And please also remove the reference in Documentation/i2c/index.rst

Oops, yes, I’ll do that in v2 once we decide where it should go.

Regards,

Stephen

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped