[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200806081605.GA5715@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 10:16:05 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc: WANG Xuerui <git@...0n.name>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...o.com>,
Liangliang Huang <huanglllzu@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: Provide Kconfig option for default IEEE 754
conformance mode
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 09:59:15PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>
>
> 在 2020/8/1 14:11, Jiaxun Yang 写道:
> >Requested by downstream distros, a Kconfig option for default
> >IEEE 754 conformance mode allows them to set their mode to
> >relaxed by default.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
> >Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@...0n.name>
> >Reviewed-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
> >Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>
> >
> >--
> >v2: Reword according to Xuerui's suggestion.
> >---
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Is it possible to get this patch into 5.9 merge window?
> I think it have got enough review tag, and the config option was requested
> by a Debian developer. The next Debian release will take 5.9 lts kernel and
> they don't want to ship a non-bootable kernel in a major release.
no I won't include it into 5.9, I need to first go through links pointed
to by Maciej and fully understand what a proper solution could be.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists