linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] powerpc/uaccess: simplify the get_fs() set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d9111162-220a-c1a8-4251-5815030cb32e@csgroup.eu>
Date:   Thu, 6 Aug 2020 11:54:44 +0200
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] powerpc/uaccess: simplify the get_fs() set_fs()
 logic



Le 06/08/2020 à 11:17, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> Do you urgently need this?  My plan for 5.10 is to rebased and submit
> the remaining bits of this branch:
> 
>      http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/set_fs-removal
> 
> which will kill off set_fs/get_fs entirely.
> 

No this isn't needed urgently at all I think.

It was sleeping in Patchwork since January, and I received comments from 
Michael a few days ago asking me to re-submit, see 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/dd2876b808ea38eb7b7f760ecd6ce06096c61fb5.1580295551.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr/

But if you are killing set_fs/get_fs entirely, that's even better I 
guess. Thanks for the hands up.

Christophe