linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] scripts/sorttable: Change section type of orc_lookup to SHT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200806150810.GA2127855@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Aug 2020 17:08:10 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     changhuaixin <changhuaixin@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...capital.net,
        michal.lkml@...kovi.net, mingo@...hat.com,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        x86@...nel.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] scripts/sorttable: Change section type of orc_lookup
 to SHT_PROGBITS


* changhuaixin <changhuaixin@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> Hi, Ingo
> 
> Another way to write SHT_PROGBITS is using elf_create_section to write orc_lookup table headers, when orc_unwind_ip table and orc_unwind table are written. Is this a better solution?
> 
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/orc_gen.c b/tools/objtool/orc_gen.c
> index 3f98dcfbc177..860d4dcec8e6 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/orc_gen.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/orc_gen.c
> @@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ int create_orc_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
>         u_sec = elf_create_section(file->elf, ".orc_unwind",
>                                    sizeof(struct orc_entry), idx);
> 
> +       /* make flags of section orc_lookup right */
> +       if (!elf_create_section(file->elf, ".orc_lookup", sizeof(int), 0))
> +               return -1;
> +
>         /* populate sections */
>         idx = 0;
>         for_each_sec(file, sec) {

Looks much nicer IMO.

Mind turning this into a proper patch that does it plus reverts the 
hack?

Thanks,

	Ingo