linux-kernel - Re: [x86/copy_mc] a0ac629ebe: fio.read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Aug 2020 17:35:00 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Erwin Tsaur <erwin.tsaur@...el.com>,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        0day robot <lkp@...el.com>, lkp@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [x86/copy_mc] a0ac629ebe: fio.read_iops -43.3% regression


* Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 6:35 AM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > * kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Greeting,
> > >
> > > FYI, we noticed a -43.3% regression of fio.read_iops due to commit:
> > >
> > >
> > > commit: a0ac629ebe7b3d248cb93807782a00d9142fdb98 ("x86/copy_mc: Introduce copy_mc_generic()")
> > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Dan-Williams/Renovate-memcpy_mcsafe-with-copy_mc_to_-user-kernel/20200802-014046
> > >
> > >
> > > in testcase: fio-basic
> > > on test machine: 96 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with 256G memory
> > > with following parameters:
> >
> > So this performance regression, if it isn't a spurious result, looks
> > concerning. Is this expected?
> 
> This is not expected and I think delays these patches until I'm back
> from leave in a few weeks. I know that we might lose some inlining
> effect due to replacing native memcpy, but I did not expect it would
> have an impact like this. In my testing I was seeing a performance
> improvement from replacing the careful / open-coded copy with rep;
> mov;, which increases the surprise of this result.

It would be nice to double check this on the kernel-test-robot side as 
well, to make sure it's not a false positive.

Thanks,

	Ingo