linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next][V2] staging: wfx: fix a handful of spelling mistakes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1d822037-d8f8-cbac-6df2-fe7296ad4d32@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 6 Aug 2020 07:16:08 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next][V2] staging: wfx: fix a handful of spelling
 mistakes

On 8/6/20 3:47 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> There are various spelling mistakes in comments and error messages.
> Fix these.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> 
> V2: add in some more fixes as spotted by Randy Dunlap
> 
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wfx/data_rx.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/staging/wfx/debug.c   | 6 +++---
>  drivers/staging/wfx/hif_rx.c  | 2 +-
>  drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c  | 4 ++--
>  drivers/staging/wfx/main.c    | 2 +-
>  drivers/staging/wfx/main.h    | 2 +-
>  drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c     | 2 +-
>  8 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/main.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/main.c
> index 11dfa088fc86..4263f912760b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/main.c
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ int wfx_probe(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
>  	err = wfx_sl_init(wdev);
>  	if (err && wdev->hw_caps.capabilities.link_mode == SEC_LINK_ENFORCED) {
>  		dev_err(wdev->dev,
> -			"chip require secure_link, but can't negociate it\n");
> +			"chip require secure_link, but can't negotiate it\n");

			      requires

>  		goto err0;
>  	}

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>

Thanks.
-- 
~Randy