[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200806133627.GB2077191@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:36:27 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, james.morse@....com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dyoung@...hat.com,
bhe@...hat.com, corbet@....net, John.P.donnelly@...cle.com,
prabhakar.pkin@...il.com, bhsharma@...hat.com, horms@...ge.net.au,
robh+dt@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, nsaenzjulienne@...e.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
guohanjun@...wei.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com, huawei.libin@...wei.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/5] x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel_low() into
crash_core.c
* Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com> wrote:
> In preparation for supporting reserve_crashkernel_low in arm64 as
> x86_64 does, move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kernel/crash_core.c.
>
> BTW, move x86_64 CRASH_ALIGN to 2M suggested by Dave. CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN
> can be selected from 2M to 16M, move to the same as arm64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h | 24 ++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 86 +++---------------------------------
> include/linux/crash_core.h | 3 ++
> include/linux/kexec.h | 2 -
> kernel/crash_core.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/kexec_core.c | 17 -------
> 6 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
Since the changes are centered around arm64, I suppose the arm64 tree
will carry this patchset?
Assuming that this is a 100% invariant moving of code that doesn't
regress on x86:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists