linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] samples/livepatch: Add README.rst disclaimer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200806120738.GQ24529@alley>
Date:   Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:07:39 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
Cc:     live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] samples/livepatch: Add README.rst disclaimer

On Tue 2020-07-21 12:14:07, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> The livepatch samples aren't very careful with respect to compiler
> IPA-optimization of target kernel functions.
> 
> Add a quick disclaimer and pointer to the compiler-considerations.rst
> file to warn readers.
> 
> Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
> ---
>  samples/livepatch/README.rst | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 samples/livepatch/README.rst

I am not sure if the RST format makes sense here. But it does not
harm. Either way:

Acked-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>

Best Regards,
Petr