[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a943a1f-c5ef-937f-f67e-1c59c04d63fb@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:36:08 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: David Niklas <Hgntkwis@...mail.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is anyone else getting a bad signature from kernel.org's 5.8
sources+Greg's sign?
On 8/5/20 5:59 PM, David Niklas wrote:
> Hello,
> I downloaded the kernel sources from kernel.org using curl, then
> opera, and finally lynx (to rule out an html parsing bug). I did the same
> with the sign and I keep getting:
>
> % gpg2 --verify linux-5.8.tar.sign linux-5.8.tar.xz
> gpg: Signature made Mon Aug 3 00:19:13 2020 EDT
> gpg: using RSA key 647F28654894E3BD457199BE38DBBDC86092693E
> gpg: BAD signature from "Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>" [unknown]
>
> I did refresh all the keys just in case.
> I believe this is important so I'm addressing this to the signer and only
> CC'ing the list.
>
> If I'm made some simple mistake, feel free to send SIG666 to my terminal.
> I did re-read the man page just in case.
It works successfully for me.
from https://www.kernel.org/category/signatures.html::
If you get "BAD signature"
If at any time you see "BAD signature" output from "gpg2 --verify", please first check the following first:
Make sure that you are verifying the signature against the .tar version of the archive, not the compressed (.tar.xz) version.
Make sure the the downloaded file is correct and not truncated or otherwise corrupted.
If you repeatedly get the same "BAD signature" output, please email helpdesk@...nel.org, so we can investigate the problem.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists