[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <654a81dcefb3024d762ff338d4bd7f14@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:12:32 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>,
Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
Cc: alix.wu@...iatek.com, DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, yj.chiang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] irqchip: irq-mt58xx: Add mt58xx series interrupt
On 2020-08-06 15:58, Daniel Palmer wrote:
> Hi Mark-PK,
>
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 23:08, Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
> wrote:
>> > Do you know if it would be possible to confirm if they are
>> > the
>> > same thing? MediaTek bought MStar a few years ago so it seems likely
>> > but I have no hard information.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, it's for the same interrupt controller IP.
>
> That's good news. :)
>
>> > If they are the same thing could we work on making one series that
>> > supports both use cases?
>>
>> Sure, and I think the irq controller driver should support both use
>> cases.
>> So how about keep the MTK version driver?
>
> I'm fine with that. Maybe you can push the MTK version and I can send
> a small patch after that to add the small bits I need?
In the interest of being vendor agnostic, please rename the properties
such as mediatek,irqs-map-range to something less brand-specific.
The compatible string should be enough.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists