[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <fbe58d27cf128d5fe581e4510ded8701858f268e.1596716328.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:19:06 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/hwirq: Remove stale forward irq_chip declaration
Since commit identified below, the forward declaration of
struct irq_chip is useless (was struct hw_interrupt_type at that time)
Remove it, together with the associated comment.
Fixes: c0ad90a32fb6 ("[PATCH] genirq: add ->retrigger() irq op to consolidate hw_irq_resend()")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
index 3a0db7b0b46e..538698facb80 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
@@ -372,12 +372,6 @@ static inline void may_hard_irq_enable(void) { }
#define ARCH_IRQ_INIT_FLAGS IRQ_NOREQUEST
-/*
- * interrupt-retrigger: should we handle this via lost interrupts and IPIs
- * or should we not care like we do now ? --BenH.
- */
-struct irq_chip;
-
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_HW_IRQ_H */
--
2.25.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists