[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C605557D-951C-4FA7-9CE2-940B92FD198D@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 12:22:56 +0800
From: changhuaixin <changhuaixin@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: changhuaixin <changhuaixin@...ux.alibaba.com>, bp@...en8.de,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...capital.net,
michal.lkml@...kovi.net, mingo@...hat.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
x86@...nel.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] scripts/sorttable: Change section type of orc_lookup
to SHT_PROGBITS
> On Aug 6, 2020, at 11:08 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> * changhuaixin <changhuaixin@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Ingo
>>
>> Another way to write SHT_PROGBITS is using elf_create_section to write orc_lookup table headers, when orc_unwind_ip table and orc_unwind table are written. Is this a better solution?
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/objtool/orc_gen.c b/tools/objtool/orc_gen.c
>> index 3f98dcfbc177..860d4dcec8e6 100644
>> --- a/tools/objtool/orc_gen.c
>> +++ b/tools/objtool/orc_gen.c
>> @@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ int create_orc_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
>> u_sec = elf_create_section(file->elf, ".orc_unwind",
>> sizeof(struct orc_entry), idx);
>>
>> + /* make flags of section orc_lookup right */
>> + if (!elf_create_section(file->elf, ".orc_lookup", sizeof(int), 0))
>> + return -1;
>> +
>> /* populate sections */
>> idx = 0;
>> for_each_sec(file, sec) {
>
> Looks much nicer IMO.
>
> Mind turning this into a proper patch that does it plus reverts the
> hack?
>
A new patchset is sent.
Thanks,
huaixin
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists