[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200807075946.GA3049898@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:59:46 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Deepak Kumar Singh <deesin@...eaurora.org>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, clew@...eaurora.org,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
Arun Kumar Neelakantam <aneela@...eaurora.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
"open list:REMOTE PROCESSOR MESSAGING (RPMSG) SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/4] rpmsg: Guard against null endpoint ops in destroy
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:15:19PM +0530, Deepak Kumar Singh wrote:
> From: Chris Lew <clew@...eaurora.org>
>
> In RPMSG GLINK the chrdev device will allocate an ept as part of the
> rpdev creation. This device will not register endpoint ops even though
> it has an allocated ept. Protect against the case where the device is
> being destroyed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Lew <clew@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Kumar Singh <deesin@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar Neelakantam <aneela@...eaurora.org>
Should this be marked for stable kernels?
And if so, what commit does this fix? Any reason the Fixes: tag was not
used here?
And what happened to this series? I don't see it in linux-next, did the
maintainer ignore it?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists