linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Add missing noinstr to arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 Aug 2020 11:24:26 +0200
From:   Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        fenghua.yu@...el.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        yu-cheng.yu@...el.com, sdeep@...are.com,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        syzbot <syzbot+8db9e1ecde74e590a657@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Add missing noinstr to arch_local*()
 helpers

On 07.08.20 11:01, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 18:06, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 15:17, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 01:32PM +0200, peterz@...radead.org wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 09:47:23AM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
>>>>> Testing my hypothesis that raw then nested non-raw
>>>>> local_irq_save/restore() breaks IRQ state tracking -- see the reproducer
>>>>> below. This is at least 1 case I can think of that we're bound to hit.
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> /me goes ponder things...
>>>>
>>>> How's something like this then?
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   include/linux/sched.h |  3 ---
>>>>   kernel/kcsan/core.c   | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>>>   2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Thank you! That approach seems to pass syzbot (also with
>>> CONFIG_PARAVIRT) and kcsan-test tests.
>>>
>>> I had to modify it some, so that report.c's use of the restore logic
>>> works and not mess up the IRQ trace printed on KCSAN reports (with
>>> CONFIG_KCSAN_VERBOSE).
>>>
>>> I still need to fully convince myself all is well now and we don't end
>>> up with more fixes. :-) If it passes further testing, I'll send it as a
>>> real patch (I want to add you as Co-developed-by, but would need your
>>> Signed-off-by for the code you pasted, I think.)
> 
> I let it run on syzbot through the night, and it's fine without
> PARAVIRT (see below). I have sent the patch (need your Signed-off-by
> as it's based on your code, thank you!):
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807090031.3506555-1-elver@google.com
> 
>> With CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y (without the notrace->noinstr patch), I still
>> get lockdep DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()), although
>> it takes longer for syzbot to hit them. But I think that's expected
>> because we can still get the recursion that I pointed out, and will
>> need that patch.
> 
> Never mind, I get these warnings even if I don't turn on KCSAN
> (CONFIG_KCSAN=n). Something else is going on with PARAVIRT=y that
> throws off IRQ state tracking. :-/

What are the settings of CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL and
CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS in this case?


Juergen