[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQ5AK_16EeCLqDJO3iCscMMKWYqVZbbj-MtpXfqoEpc5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:22:57 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
peter enderborg <peter.enderborg@...y.com>,
ThiƩbaud Weksteen <tweek@...gle.com>,
Nick Kralevich <nnk@...gle.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selinux: add attributes to avc tracepoint
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:37 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 08:32:38 -0400
> Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > In the commit message or in a Documentation/trace/events-avc.rst ?
> >
> > I was just asking for it in the commit message / patch description. I
> > don't know what is typical for Documentation/trace.
>
> No, the Documentation/trace is for generic tracing documentation. Not
> for individual events.
As I've said many times in the past, I've never rejected a patch
because the patch description was too verbose, but I have rejected
patches where the description hasn't provided enough useful
information.
I would really like to see the commit description show an example
where you setup/load/etc. the event into the kernel, trigger and
capture the event information, and then show how the event output can
be parsed/processed into something meaningful by a user. I'm
essentially looking for a "hello world" version of the SELinux
tracepoint, does that make sense?
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists