[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200807193510.GG17456@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 20:35:10 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: silence soft lockups from unlock_page
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 11:41:09AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> My home testing was, effectively, on top of c6fe44d96fc1 (v5.8 plus
> your two patches): I did not have in the io_uring changes from the
> current tree. In glancing there, I noticed one new and one previous
> instance of SetPageWaiters() *after* __add_wait_queue_entry_tail():
> are those correct?
By the way, don't do any performance testing on current Linus tree.
This commit:
commit 37f4a24c2469a10a4c16c641671bd766e276cf9f (refs/bisect/bad)
Author: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Date: Tue Jun 30 22:03:57 2020 +0800
blk-mq: centralise related handling into blk_mq_get_driver_tag
Move .nr_active update and request assignment into blk_mq_get_driver_tag(),
all are good to do during getting driver tag.
Meantime blk-flush related code is simplified and flush request needn't
to update the request table manually any more.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
slows everything down, at least on my test qemu system. Seems like it's
losing block queue tags.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists