[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ed51691d4e129b5c30343a89a107d4ff9dd89ce.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 15:41:57 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
"vincent.guittot" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, kernel-team@...com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dietmar.eggeman" <dietmar.eggeman@....com>
Subject: Re: CFS flat runqueue proposal fixes/update
On Fri, 2020-08-07 at 16:14 +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 31/07/2020 09:42, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Possible solution
> > ...
> I imagine that I can see what you want to achieve here ;-)
>
> But it's hard since your v5 RFC
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190906191237.27006-1-riel@surriel.com is
> pretty old by now.
The v5 patches also do not implement this new idea, and
still suffer from the corner cases that Paul Turner
pointed out last year.
> Do you have a version of the patch-set against tip/sched/core? Quite
> a
> lot has changed (runnable load avg replaced by runnable avg, rq->load
> is
> gone, CFS load balance rework).
Not yet. We got a baby this spring, so I've been busy
with things like milk and diapers, instead of with
code.
I wanted to get this proposal out before Plumbers, so
we could at least talk about it, and maybe find flaws
with this idea before I spend weeks/months implementing it :)
> IMHO it would be extremely helpful to have a current patch-set to
> discuss how these other problems can be covered by patches on top.
Agreed. I hope to get some time to work on that, but
no guarantees about getting it ready before Plumbers :)
--
All Rights Reversed.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists