[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200807200957.1269454-10-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 14:09:56 -0600
From: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
To: jbaron@...mai.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] dyndbg: add locking around zpool-add loop in zpool-init
summary: no fix here.
Locking review:
ddebug_zpool_init(), like other *_init() routines, does not run under
a lock (that we control). Unlike them, it runs later, at late_init.
I dont know whether this is pertinent to the kernel panic.
ddebug_callsite_get/put() are called as a pair under mutex-lock for
all 3 callsite users; dynamic_emit_prefix() does its own ABBA-ish LGPU
(Lock-Get-Put-Unlock), as does ddebug_change().
ddebug_proc_show() does GP, ddebug_proc_start|stop() wrap it with LU.
ddebug_add_module() does LU to protect list_add(), HEAD~x added
ddebug_zpool_add() inside that protection.
This commit adds locking to ddebug_zpool_init(), around the loop of
ddebug_zpool_add(), to match the locking in ddebug_add_module().
Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
---
lib/dynamic_debug.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/dynamic_debug.c b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
index 9c51f24a9c66..716231a98910 100644
--- a/lib/dynamic_debug.c
+++ b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
@@ -1187,8 +1187,10 @@ static void __init ddebug_zpool_init(void)
}
/* add-module normally does this, but not in time for builtins */
+ mutex_lock(&ddebug_lock);
for (iter = __start___dyndbg; iter < __stop___dyndbg; iter++)
ddebug_zpool_add(iter);
+ mutex_unlock(&ddebug_lock);
v2pr_info("total pages: %lu compaction: %lu\n",
zs_get_total_pages(dd_callsite_zpool),
@@ -1285,4 +1287,3 @@ early_initcall(dynamic_debug_init);
/* Debugfs setup must be done later */
fs_initcall(dynamic_debug_init_control);
-
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists