lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 8 Aug 2020 17:14:43 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        "Peter Meerwald-Stadler" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] iio: light: as73211: New driver

On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:46:36 +0200
Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> On Thursday, 6 August 2020, 19:44:51 CEST, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
> > 
> > I'll take this, but please send a follow up patch to add documentation
> > for in_intensity_x_raw and all the other new ABI this adds in
> > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> > I should have mentioned that earlier, but kind of assumed we already
> > had these documented for some reason!  
> where to add these entries in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio?
> Shall all missing entries be added together at the bottom (as AS73211
> is the first device using it) , or inserted in different existing paragraphs
> (when the enums where introduced)?

Insert them into the relevant groups that already exist.  In some cases
it will just be adding an entry with no specific explanation.
For the _raw attribute add a bit more info about what x, y and z are
(basically just say they are from cie1931 (I think?)

> 
> Which kernel version shall I use (5.10)?
This file doesn't change that quickly so that should be fine. I'll deal
with any merge conflicts that do occur.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> regards
> Christian
> 
> 
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists