[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200810084707.0745be30@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:47:07 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the fsinfo tree with the vfs tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 19:05:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the fsinfo tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/internal.h
>
> between commits:
>
> c60166f04283 ("init: add an init_mount helper")
> 09267defa36a ("init: add an init_umount helper")
>
> from the vfs tree and commits:
>
> 8c62d62ddd1f ("fsinfo: Allow retrieval of superblock devname, options and stats")
> df9f487eeb11 ("fsinfo: Allow fsinfo() to look up a mount object by ID")
> 0a83b1d9fdcd ("fsinfo: Allow mount information to be queried")
> 969ba80e4121 ("fsinfo: Allow mount topology and propagation info to be retrieved")
> a177ce034bec ("fsinfo: Add an attribute that lists all the visible mounts in a namespace")
>
> from the fsinfo tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc fs/internal.h
> index 10517ece4516,267b4aaf0271..000000000000
> --- a/fs/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/internal.h
> @@@ -96,11 -95,15 +102,20 @@@ extern int __mnt_want_write_file(struc
> extern void __mnt_drop_write_file(struct file *);
>
> extern void dissolve_on_fput(struct vfsmount *);
> +
> +int path_mount(const char *dev_name, struct path *path,
> + const char *type_page, unsigned long flags, void *data_page);
> +int path_umount(struct path *path, int flags);
> +
> + extern int lookup_mount_object(struct path *, unsigned int, struct path *);
> + extern int fsinfo_generic_mount_source(struct path *, struct fsinfo_context *);
> + extern int fsinfo_generic_mount_info(struct path *, struct fsinfo_context *);
> + extern int fsinfo_generic_mount_topology(struct path *, struct fsinfo_context *);
> + extern int fsinfo_generic_mount_point(struct path *, struct fsinfo_context *);
> + extern int fsinfo_generic_mount_point_full(struct path *, struct fsinfo_context *);
> + extern int fsinfo_generic_mount_children(struct path *, struct fsinfo_context *);
> + extern int fsinfo_generic_mount_all(struct path *, struct fsinfo_context *);
> +
> /*
> * fs_struct.c
> */
This is now a conflict between the fsinfo tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists