[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1073b86-ebd5-68b6-7761-99669dd93e1c@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2020 22:34:50 -0400
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] x86/paravirt: remove 32-bit support from
PARAVIRT_XXL
On 8/7/20 4:38 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> @@ -377,10 +373,7 @@ static inline pte_t __pte(pteval_t val)
> {
> pteval_t ret;
>
> - if (sizeof(pteval_t) > sizeof(long))
> - ret = PVOP_CALLEE2(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val, (u64)val >> 32);
> - else
> - ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val);
> + ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val);
>
> return (pte_t) { .pte = ret };
Can this now simply return (pte_t) ret?
-boris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists