linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200809190325.70d60bc7@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Sun, 9 Aug 2020 19:03:25 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the set_fs tree with the battery
 tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 21:01:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the set_fs tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/power/supply/da9030_battery.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   9d832cd36c60 ("power: Convert to DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE")
> 
> from the battery tree and commit:
> 
>   4d4901c6d748 ("seq_file: switch over direct seq_read method calls to seq_read_iter")
> 
> from the set_fs tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I just used the former) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

This is nw a conflict between the set_fs tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped