lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:06:27 +0800
From:   Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
To:     Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
Cc:     "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: dts: mt7623: move more display-related nodes to mt7623n.dtsi

Hi, Frank:

Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de> 於 2020年8月9日 週日 下午3:22寫道:
>
>
>
> Am 9. August 2020 02:16:59 MESZ schrieb Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>:
> >
> >I would like to put all device in mt7623.dtsi with some device's
> >status is "disabled" and change its status in platform dtsi.
> >I would like to see all device in mt7623.dtsi because of its name. If
> >you move some device to platform dtsi, we would trace all platform
> >dtsi to find out how many device in mt7623. One day a new platform
> >enable different devices, you would reorganize all these platform
> >dtsi?
>
> Ok,then i change the dts-patch from hdmi-series to disable all nodes and enabling them in bpi-r2 dts. Do they need to be in alphabetical order (or any other)?

Alphabetical order is better.

>
> Is the tmds Patch ok? (because review missing) https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11700679/

That patch looks really like a hack patch. I would wait for a long
time to see whether any one has comment for this. Or you could have a
better explain for it.
I could apply other patches first.

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

>
> Just to know before reposting series as v5 :)
> regards Frank

Powered by blists - more mailing lists