[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200810191028.3793884-57-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:10:25 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 57/60] io_uring: fix racy overflow count reporting
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit b2bd1cf99f3e7c8fbf12ea07af2c6998e1209e25 ]
All ->cq_overflow modifications should be under completion_lock,
otherwise it can report a wrong number to the userspace. Fix it in
io_uring_cancel_files().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 80a612d1e12bb..d04fede20acb8 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -7573,10 +7573,9 @@ static void io_uring_cancel_files(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
clear_bit(0, &ctx->sq_check_overflow);
clear_bit(0, &ctx->cq_check_overflow);
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
-
WRITE_ONCE(ctx->rings->cq_overflow,
atomic_inc_return(&ctx->cached_cq_overflow));
+ spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
/*
* Put inflight ref and overflow ref. If that's
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists