[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1597042656.11360.39.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:57:36 +0800
From: Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@...iatek.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
CC: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Seiya Wang (王迺君)
<seiya.wang@...iatek.com>,
Stanley Chu (朱原陞)
<stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Yingjoe Chen (陳英洲)
<Yingjoe.Chen@...iatek.com>,
Fan Chen (陳凡)
<fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
"Yong Liang (梁勇)"
<Yong.Liang@...iatek.com>, "Suman Anna" <s-anna@...com>,
"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
Subject: Re: [v2,5/6] reset-controller: ti: Introduce force-update method
On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 15:03 +0800, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Crystal,
>
> On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 14:15 +0800, Crystal Guo wrote:
> > Introduce force-update method for assert and deassert interface,
> > which force the write operation in case the read already happens
> > to return the correct value.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@...iatek.com>
>
> Added Suman and Andrew for confirmation: I think writing unconditionally
> can't break any existing user. Just changing to regmap_write_bits()
> instead of adding the update-force property as in v1 should be fine.
>
> regards
> Philipp
>
Hi Suman, Andrew,
Can you help to give some suggestions about this change.
Is this can be changed to write unconditionally, or should I add a
update-force property to force the write operation.
Best regards
Crystal.
> > ---
> > drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c b/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c
> > index 1c74bcb9a6c3..f4baf78afd14 100644
> > --- a/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c
> > @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct ti_syscon_reset_data {
> > struct ti_syscon_reset_control *controls;
> > unsigned int nr_controls;
> > bool assert_deassert_together;
> > + bool update_force;
> > };
> >
> > #define to_ti_syscon_reset_data(rcdev) \
> > @@ -90,7 +91,10 @@ static int ti_syscon_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> > mask = BIT(control->assert_bit);
> > value = (control->flags & ASSERT_SET) ? mask : 0x0;
> >
> > - return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, control->assert_offset, mask, value);
> > + if (data->update_force)
> > + return regmap_write_bits(data->regmap, control->assert_offset, mask, value);
> > + else
> > + return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, control->assert_offset, mask, value);
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -121,7 +125,10 @@ static int ti_syscon_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> > mask = BIT(control->deassert_bit);
> > value = (control->flags & DEASSERT_SET) ? mask : 0x0;
> >
> > - return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, control->deassert_offset, mask, value);
> > + if (data->update_force)
> > + return regmap_write_bits(data->regmap, control->deassert_offset, mask, value);
> > + else
> > + return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, control->deassert_offset, mask, value);
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -223,6 +230,10 @@ static int ti_syscon_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > data->assert_deassert_together = true;
> > else
> > data->assert_deassert_together = false;
> > + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "update-force"))
> > + data->update_force = true;
> > + else
> > + data->update_force = false;
> >
> > data->rcdev.ops = &ti_syscon_reset_ops;
> > data->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > --
> > 2.18.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists