linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 3/3] regulator: push supply

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <8945eae5cf10d58f3c377b4f8dd578418a296df5.1597089543.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date:   Mon, 10 Aug 2020 22:09:22 +0200
From:   Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/3] regulator: push supply_name allocation outside of
 lock

Move all allocations outside of the regulator_lock().

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.7.13+ #535 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
f2fs_discard-179:7/702 is trying to acquire lock:
c0e5d920 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x2c0

but task is already holding lock:
cb95b080 (&dcc->cmd_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __issue_discard_cmd+0xec/0x5f8

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

[...]

-> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       fs_reclaim_acquire.part.11+0x40/0x50
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x24/0x28
       __kmalloc_track_caller+0x54/0x218
       kstrdup+0x40/0x5c
       create_regulator+0xf4/0x368
       regulator_resolve_supply+0x1a0/0x200
       regulator_register+0x9c8/0x163c

[...]

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  regulator_list_mutex --> &sit_i->sentry_lock --> &dcc->cmd_lock

[...]

Fixes: f8702f9e4aa7 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 05c9657c99d9..5f518e034c90 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1557,41 +1557,48 @@ static struct regulator *create_regulator(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 					  const char *supply_name)
 {
 	struct regulator *regulator;
-	char buf[REG_STR_SIZE];
-	int err, size;
+	int err;
+
+	if (dev) {
+		char buf[REG_STR_SIZE];
+		int size;
+
+		size = snprintf(buf, REG_STR_SIZE, "%s-%s",
+				dev->kobj.name, supply_name);
+		if (size >= REG_STR_SIZE)
+			return NULL;
+
+		supply_name = kstrdup(buf, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (supply_name == NULL)
+			return NULL;
+	} else {
+		supply_name = kstrdup_const(supply_name, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (supply_name == NULL)
+			return NULL;
+	}
 
 	regulator = kzalloc(sizeof(*regulator), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (regulator == NULL)
+	if (regulator == NULL) {
+		kfree(supply_name);
 		return NULL;
+	}
 
 	regulator_lock(rdev);
 	regulator->rdev = rdev;
+	regulator->supply_name = supply_name;
 	list_add(&regulator->list, &rdev->consumer_list);
 
 	if (dev) {
 		regulator->dev = dev;
 
 		/* Add a link to the device sysfs entry */
-		size = snprintf(buf, REG_STR_SIZE, "%s-%s",
-				dev->kobj.name, supply_name);
-		if (size >= REG_STR_SIZE)
-			goto overflow_err;
-
-		regulator->supply_name = kstrdup(buf, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (regulator->supply_name == NULL)
-			goto overflow_err;
-
 		err = sysfs_create_link_nowarn(&rdev->dev.kobj, &dev->kobj,
-					buf);
+					       supply_name);
 		if (err) {
 			rdev_dbg(rdev, "could not add device link %s err %d\n",
 				  dev->kobj.name, err);
 			/* non-fatal */
 		}
-	} else {
-		regulator->supply_name = kstrdup_const(supply_name, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (regulator->supply_name == NULL)
-			goto overflow_err;
 	}
 
 	regulator->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(regulator->supply_name,
@@ -1621,11 +1628,6 @@ static struct regulator *create_regulator(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 
 	regulator_unlock(rdev);
 	return regulator;
-overflow_err:
-	list_del(&regulator->list);
-	kfree(regulator);
-	regulator_unlock(rdev);
-	return NULL;
 }
 
 static int _regulator_get_enable_time(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
-- 
2.20.1