[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200810212506.GH3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 23:25:06 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardo@...gle.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
will@...nel.org, Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardojr@...il.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: added lockdep support
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 04:17:42PM -0500, Uriel Guajardo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 3:35 PM Brendan Higgins
> <brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 1:43 PM Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardo@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:37 PM Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardojr@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardo@...gle.com>
> > > >
> > > > KUnit tests will now fail if lockdep detects an error during a test
> > > > case.
> > > >
> > > > The idea comes from how lib/locking-selftest [1] checks for lock errors: we
> > > > first if lock debugging is turned on. If not, an error must have
> > > > occurred, so we fail the test and restart lockdep for the next test case.
> > > >
> > > > Like the locking selftests, we also fix possible preemption count
> > > > corruption from lock bugs.
> >
> > Sorry, just noticed: You probably want to send this to some of the
> > lockdep maintainers or the maintainers of the kselftest for lockdep.
> >
>
> Thanks for the reminder. CC'ed lockdep maintainers.
Please resend as a whole, this is an unreadable mess.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists