linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm/hugetlb: count file_region to be added when regions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:46:21 -0700
From:   Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To:     Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm/hugetlb: count file_region to be added when
 regions_needed != NULL

On 8/7/20 2:12 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
> There are only two cases of function add_reservation_in_range()
> 
>     * count file_region and return the number in regions_needed
>     * do the real list operation without counting
> 
> This means it is not necessary to have two parameters to classify these
> two cases.
> 
> Just use regions_needed to separate them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>

Thanks!

I really like removal of the 'count_only' parameter.  However, within the
routine 'count_only' made the code just a little easier to understand. I
might have:
- Removed the function parameter.
- Added local variable
  bool count_only = regions_needed != NULL;
- Left remaining code as it.

I'm OK with the proposed change.  Any change to readability is VERY minimal.

Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>

-- 
Mike Kravetz