[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3252495-2d5e-269f-6fa2-f46bbf609a53@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2020 18:16:59 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Joshua Thompson <funaho@...ai.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>,
Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@...nde.co.uk>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] macintosh/via-macii: Poll the device most likely to
respond
Hi,
On 8/9/20 3:58 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Aug 2020, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 02:23:12PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
>>> Poll the most recently polled device by default, rather than the lowest
>>> device address that happens to be enabled in autopoll_devs. This improves
>>> input latency. Re-use macii_queue_poll() rather than duplicate that logic.
>>> This eliminates a static struct and function.
>>>
>>> Fixes: d95fd5fce88f0 ("m68k: Mac II ADB fixes") # v5.0+
>>> Tested-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@...oo.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
>>
>> With this patch applied, the qemu "q800" emulation no longer works and
>> is stuck in early boot. Any idea why that might be the case, and/or how
>> to debug it ?
>>
>
> The problem you're seeing was mentioned in the cover letter,
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k/cover.1593318192.git.fthain@telegraphics.com.au/
>
> Since this series was merged, Linus' tree is no longer compatible with
> long-standing QEMU bugs.
>
> The best way to fix this is to upgrade QEMU (latest is 5.1.0-rc3). Or use
> the serial console instead of the framebuffer console.
>
I have no problem with that. Actually, I had checked the qemu commit log,
but somehow I had missed missed the commits there.
> I regret the inconvenience but the alternative was worse: adding code to
> Linux to get compatibility with QEMU bugs (which were added to QEMU due to
> Linux bugs).
>
> My main concern is correct operation on actual hardware, as always. But
> some QEMU developers are working on support for operating systems besides
> Linux.
>
> Therefore, I believe that both QEMU and Linux should aim for compatibility
> with actual hardware and not bug compatibility with each other.
>
I absolutely agree.
I repeated the test on the mainline kernel with qemu v5.1-rc3, and it works.
I also made sure that older versions of Linux still work with the qemu
v5.1.0-rc3. So everything is good, and sorry for the noise.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists