linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Get "extal" clock rate by clk_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA+D8ANmEMnRR1N4QRh7y4=+XUpKYnXRQ4LRKw6VG=totd8rwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:50:10 +0800
From:   Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Cc:     Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>, Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Get "extal" clock rate by clk_get_rate

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 4:39 PM Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 04:11:43PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > On some platform(.e.g. i.MX8QM MEK), the "extal" clock is different
> > with the mclk of codec, then the clock rate is also different.
> > So it is better to get clock rate of "extal" rate by clk_get_rate,
> > don't reuse the clock rate of mclk.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
> > ---
> > changes in v2
> > - add defer probe handler
> >
> >  sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> > index 52adedc03245..32f8f756e6bb 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> > @@ -696,6 +696,17 @@ static int fsl_asoc_card_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >                       goto asrc_fail;
> >               }
> >       } else if (of_node_name_eq(cpu_np, "esai")) {
> > +             struct clk *esai_clk = clk_get(&cpu_pdev->dev, "extal");
> > +
> > +             if (!IS_ERR(esai_clk)) {
> > +                     priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[TX] = clk_get_rate(esai_clk);
> > +                     priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[RX] = clk_get_rate(esai_clk);
>
> Will it break existing imx-audio-cs42888 on older i.MX platforms?
> 'cause it overwrites cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[] that are set in "card
> configurations" section.

Tested,  no break for imx6.

best regards
wang shengjiu