[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200810094413.GA7579@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:14:13 +0530
From: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@...il.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn@...gaas.com>,
Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhav.varodek@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>,
Antonino Daplas <adaplas@...il.com>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-geode@...ts.infradead.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/12] fbdev: gxfb: use generic power management
> > > -static int gxfb_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> > > +static int __maybe_unused gxfb_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > {
> > > - struct fb_info *info = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > + struct fb_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > I do not see any dev_set_drvdata() so I guess we get a NULL pointer
> > here which is not intended.
> > Adding a dev_set_data() to gxfb_probe() would do the trick.
> >
> gxfb_probe() invokes pci_set_drvdata(pdev, info) which in turn calls
> dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, data). Adding dev_get_drvdata() will be redundant.
>
s/dev_get_drvdata/dev_set_drvdata
Thanks
Vaibhav Gupta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists