[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200810124813.1555677-1-mst@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:48:39 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org
Subject: [PATCH] vdpa_sim: init iommu lock
The patch adding the iommu lock did not initialize it.
The struct is zero-initialized so this is mostly a problem
when using lockdep.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>
Fixes: 0ea9ee430e74 ("vdpasim: protect concurrent access to iommu iotlb")
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
---
drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
index df3224b138ee..604d9d25ca47 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
@@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ static struct vdpasim *vdpasim_create(void)
INIT_WORK(&vdpasim->work, vdpasim_work);
spin_lock_init(&vdpasim->lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&vdpasim->iommu_lock);
dev = &vdpasim->vdpa.dev;
dev->coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists