linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dma-buf.rst: repair length of title underline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:06:20 +0200
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     christian.koenig@....com
Cc:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf.rst: repair length of title underline

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 01:25:40PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 09.08.20 um 08:17 schrieb Lukas Bulwahn:
> > With commit 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are
> > a bad idea"), document generation warns:
> > 
> >    Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst:182: \
> >    WARNING: Title underline too short.
> > 
> > Repair length of title underline to remove warning.
> > 
> > Fixes: 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad idea")
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> 
> Should I pick it up into drm-misc-next?

Yes please. For the future if you need to check if someone has commit
rights and can push themselves:

https://people.freedesktop.org/~seanpaul/whomisc.html

Yeah with gitlab this would all be a bit more reasonable, but we get by
meanwhile :-)

Cheers, Daniel
> 
> > ---
> > Daniel, please pick this minor non-urgent fix to your new documentation.
> > 
> >   Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> > index 100bfd227265..13ea0cc0a3fa 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> > @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ DMA Fence uABI/Sync File
> >      :internal:
> >   Indefinite DMA Fences
> > -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >   At various times &dma_fence with an indefinite time until dma_fence_wait()
> >   finishes have been proposed. Examples include:
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch